The Black Book by Orhan Pamuk Review

I have visited Turkey, but not Istanbul. It's one of thoseis no other city on earth that has been named three
iconic places that keeps cropping up in travel plans, buttimes and where, on each occasion, that name has
then gets overlooked, possibly because its name fitspassed into language as an expression of political,
so easily into my thoughts that I convince myself Istrategic, religious and economic pre-eminence. It's a
have already been there. Having just read Orhancity that bridges continents, ideologies and faiths.
Pamuk's The Black Book, that illusion will be orders ofNowhere else on earth has a greater claim to the
magnitude stronger. Orhan Pamuk won the 2006very quintessence of humanity than Istanbul. And yet
Nobel Prize for literature and this seems to havemodern Istanbul is a Turkish city, and perhaps its most
spurned new translations of his work, new versionsfascinating aspect is its potential to mirror
which hopefully can widen his readership in thecontemporary debates on religion versus secularism,
English-speaking world.tradition versus modernity, imperial past versus global
The Black Book is a gigantic work. And, in the waypresent.
that I suspect most readers might understand the term,The Black Book has thirty-six chapters, each having its
there is no plot. Suffice it to say that Galip wakes upown title and prefacing quotation. The form, at least in
one morning and his wife has disappeared. Hepart, is its content, in that each chapter could be read
assumes she has gone off to seek out her firstas if it were an article written by Celal or by Galip
husband, Celal, a well-known newspaper columnist.impersonating Celal. There is no linear narrative. We
Galip sets off to find Celal and, he assumes, his wife,experience what inspired the writer and there is no
but strangely the journalist has also disappeared. As aordering of time or place. But we feel we are in that
means to help him track down the two missing people,city. We feel we are living its history, whatever that
Galip immerses himself in Celal's life, his writing and,might be. And we feel we are experiencing
gradually, his very identity. Effectively he becomes thecontemporary debates on its and its people's identity.
person he is seeking. He re-reads his past work andThe city is central to everything in the book, with its
discovers unknown things about his own, his wife's andmultiple histories and allegiances mixed into the melting
her former husband's past. By then, however, wepot of its contemporary form.
cannot be sure if we are dealing with reminiscences ofThroughout, Galip finds he gradually becomes his
Celal, Galip's interpretations of them, Galip's reworkingquarry, Celal. He trades identities and roles, but never
of them, or, indeed, Galip's own words presented as ifpermanently, never for sure. In this way the characters
they were those of Celal.become the city, whose sense of place and multiplicity
But the plot in The Black Book is almost irrelevant. It'sof identities pervade all, thus mirroring the apparent
not a book that one reads to discover what happens.confusion of its - and humanity's - complexity. But the
It's a book that's replete with flavour, experience andpeople eventually are always welcomed by some
history, and the reader feasts on vast helpings of allaspect of the city's - and humanity's - multi-faceted
three.nature.
Byzantium, Constantinople, Istanbul - let's face it, there